Category Archives: General

Learning by not doing

So earlier tonight I went to Exposure.Roanoke‘s “Shooting Regular People” workshop. I went loaded for bear; F-1, motordrive, several rolls of film, 28, 50 and 135mm lenses, a light stand, umbrella and radio triggered hotshoe flash. The whole 9 yards.

I only shot about 6 photos, all of them of other people taking photographs.

But I did spend a fair bit of time watching Curt Warwick directing several of the models who sat for him, even did a brief stint sitting in front of the camera myself, and I know I learned more than if I’d just set up in a corner somewhere and attempted portraits.

Watching and being directed by someone who has done a lot of excellent quality portraiture work was eye opening. Now, I need to put it into practice a bit and take my portrait work beyond the “Smile! *click*” level. I’m thinking, for starters, that Kelli might want some good headshots for when she gets published! At least that’s my excuse…

In defense of free choice

The Internet is awash with people who invest a great deal of their emotional capital into defending their technology choices and tearing down anything which isn’t what they use.

As a photographer who chooses to shoot mainly film, I see that a lot online (not at all in real life, strangely enough; if anything I get curious interest about my use of film). People for whom digital is the best thing ever will latch onto articles or comments which suggest that film might not be dead and may have useful applications, advantages even, and will proceed to shred them with arguments over why they would never use film ever, even if you put a gun to their head, and how obviously we’re all stupid idiots for wanting to, and why don’t we just give in and use the same thing they are. Film diehards will fire right back, pointing out digital’s perceived technical and aesthetic deficiencies, or how all digital photographers are sloppy “spray and pray” merchants with no technique or style and how you can pry their film out from their cold, dead hands.

You know what it reminds me of? High school. The computer “format wars” of the 1980’s. “My Commodore 64 is better than your stupid Spectrum!”[1] “My Spectrum is better than your dumb Commie!” “Your computer sounds like a robot farting!” “Well your computer can only display shades of brown!”… ignoring the fact that both systems did an excellent job by the standards of the time, had their own strengths and weaknesses, and had more software titles than any 12-year old could possibly hope to own, legally or otherwise.

Some things never change. Only now, you can be an annoying know-it-all anonymously, without risk of ending up in detention for shouting in the library or getting into a fist fight in the corridor over which version of “Elite” was better, and it’s adults, not pre-teens, engaging in these stupid pissing contests.

You know what? It’s all stupid. One size does not fit all. Your choice, which you defend passionately as if anyone using anything else had personally insulted you, might not be the best choice for everyone!

I stand here in defense of choice, of my right to choose whatever product or medium I want to use regardless of what you think, and your right to do likewise unto me. I’m happy with my choices right now. I’d rather be out with my chosen camera, making photographs, than sitting here writing an editorial wondering why so many people feel like they have to force their choices on everyone else or risk being somehow a lesser person. Why does it matter so much to you if you’re so happy with what you chose, if it works for you? If your choice is so superior, why the need to defend it so vehemently? Surely if it was so much better it would stand up for itself without your help? Insecure much?

You can, if you’re fortunate, change the world with a camera. But you won’t ever change the world by sitting on your arse arguing over which camera is better or which lens is sharper. Get over yourself. Get out. Make photographs! Have fun! And for God’s sake stop trying to screw it up for those of us who just want to enjoy the tools we chose to use instead of the ones you think we should.

 

[1] Apologies to those of an American persuasion (and those who got into computers much later) who may never have heard of a “Spectrum”, or maybe even a Commodore 64, or experienced the joy of loading software from audio cassette.

Going back and increasing resolution. Just try *that* with digital.

So rumor has it that Sony have a 30+MP DSLR in the works. Which, I will admit, has me wondering just how many pixels I really need. I rarely print beyond 8×10.

But maybe I might want to print larger sometime, if my image is too small I’m stuck, so wouldn’t I want to shoot at the highest pixel count my camera can offer?

But usually I don’t. Usually those extra pixels would be wasted, so why bother with them? Why pay more to get them, and store them?

Kind of a dilemma. Wouldn’t it be nice if you could go back and increase the resolution of your old images somehow, yet not have to store huge files which you never really use most of the time?

With film you can. I can make scans good enough for my normal purposes (online posting, maybe up to 8×10 printing) and if I really need a huge print, I can go back and have someone make one using equipment I could never justify owning for the rare times it would be used. Problem solved!

GlassClops – a new online magazine devoted to film photography

I’m a little jealous of the folks over in San Jose, California. Turns out they have a community darkroom, the Darkroom@De-Bug. Since I don’t really have room to set up a workable darkroom in our apartment, access to something like this locally would be fantastic. Oh well…

Anyway a few days ago I received an email from the co-editor of a new online magazine that the Darkroom is producing, devoted to film photography. The magazine is named “GlassClops” and the first issue features some excellent photography, all produced on film.

In this issue we featured; David Bacon (a world renowned
photojournalist), Braulio Gonzalez ( a student photographer on the
rise from East Palo Alto), Ronald Orlando (a musician photographer
with profound images), Felipe R. Vasquez of newark califas (a
photographer with keen eye for chicano culture imagery), and Charisse
Domingo ( a photo journalist who showed us her first image she made).

Go on over and check out their inaugural August issue!